Vote for the best verboticism.
DEFINITION: v. To have a favorite article of clothing with which you develop a personal, and even a deeply fulfilling, relationship. n. A much loved article of clothing.
Verboticisms
Click on each verboticism to read the sentences created by the Verbotomy writers, and to see your voting options...
You have two votes. Click on the words to read the details, then vote your favorite.
Wrapture
Created by: fmgene
Pronunciation: rap - ture
Sentence: that diane von fustenburg dress sent the assembled audience into wraptures
Etymology: wrap + rapture
Sextillism
Created by: isopraxis
Pronunciation: like it reads
Sentence: I can't wear these calvins without having a bout of the old sextillisms.
Etymology: Sex textiles
Clothemarriage
Created by: chrisk2k7
Pronunciation: clo- the - marr - idge
Sentence:
Etymology:
Attirelationship
Created by: gorillo
Pronunciation: A-tire'-e-la"-tion-ship
Sentence: She won't part with her little black dress, she's in an attirelationship with it.
Etymology:
Vestamorous
Created by: knave
Pronunciation:
Sentence: She's a little too vestamorous for me -- I just wear my clothes.
Etymology: vest - from Latin vestire to clothe amorous - from Latin amor love
Lovochka
Created by: serjion
Pronunciation: love-och-ka
Sentence: When I pass my exams, I wear this lovochka of mine every time
Etymology: love-root+russian suffix "ochk" + vowel "a" to make the noun sound more feminine
Intimaties
Created by: ipswich78
Pronunciation: in-tim-it-ties
Sentence:
Etymology: intimate and ties
Fetisha
Created by: LenhardtLac
Pronunciation: f'-tishö
Sentence: I won't give these shirts to you, It grew to be a fetisha to me throughout these years... oh God...
Etymology:
Comments:
Jonno - 2006-12-14: 04:40:00
Hi all! New to this and it's fun, but here's my 3 cents worth... 1. Placing the most voted-for words at the top of the list biases the voting. 2. Words entered earlier are subject to more votes. Could you not take all the entries before voting begins? Or have voting for yesterday's word while today's definitions are open? 3. You should add the part of speech to the definition (verb, noun, etc). I think the celeverer words are the ones which match the definition. 4. Please make these comment boxes a bit bigger! Thanks, Jon.
Hey Jonno, Thanks for your suggestions. They are all good! We are working on way to divide players/words into smaller groups, which will change the way verboticisms are listed, and the way voting happens. Stay tuned... In terms of the "part of speech", we actually had that in earlier, but took it out because people didn't like it. We could add it back... What do you guys think? Thanks for playing! ~ James
ErWenn - 2006-12-14: 12:14:00
I've just joined, and so far, every definition has been for a verb, but most of them lend themselves better to nouns. For example, it's easier to name a disease or condition than it is to give a word that describes succumbing to such a condition. Most of the winning words are nouns, as you can see. I think you should either formally open it up for any part of speech communicating the idea, choose the part of speech for each definition more carefully, or strictly enforce matching the part of speech of the definition.
philip - 2006-12-14: 12:31:00
Nice idea, look forward to playing :) Agree with Jonno on all points, especially the problem that entries made earlier will automatically get more votes...
verbatul - 2006-12-14: 12:35:00
James, the parts of speech is a great idea! It seems that we have a lot of clever people suggesting words so I don't think any creativity will be suffer. In fact, it may inspire more ingenuity. Great game!
I think that we might take a tip from ErWenn keep it formally open to all parts of speech, but then allow players to create variants for specific part of speech (e.g, a verb, a noun, an adj,) and award bonus points for the extra creativity. ~ James
artipt - 2018-12-08: 15:02:00
Приветствую! Хотите заработать деньги? Тогда смотрите курс! http://glprt.ru/affiliate/9916886/vypolneniezadachzadengivinternete - Выполнение зада